dubito che mai ci sarannoLen801 ha scritto:E tu vedi Evil Angel, Wicked, Vivid, FSC, LATATA, qualche altro major studio porno nella lista di donatori??dell ha scritto:qualcosa inizia a muoversi sono ad 800, di certo nn vedo molto entusiasmo fino ad ora x questa ragazza
Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
Moderatori: Super Zeta, AlexSmith, Pim, Moderatore1
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
"Da putèi tuti bèi, da morti tuti santi".
"Questa notte splendida darà i colori al nostro stemma: il nero e l'azzurro sullo sfondo d'oro delle stelle. Si chiamerà Internazionale, perché noi siamo fratelli del mondo."
"Questa notte splendida darà i colori al nostro stemma: il nero e l'azzurro sullo sfondo d'oro delle stelle. Si chiamerà Internazionale, perché noi siamo fratelli del mondo."
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
LA FSC la spacciava per una nuova di zecca che non aveva ancora entrata nel giro porno di L.A. che come si vede non e' vero. Non tutte le scene o film che avra girato sono tutti uscite o pubblicate. Ha solo 20 anni.Len801 ha scritto: E veniamo a questa Sofia. Le conosci già ma le posto ugualmente, la scheda IAFD e Data 18 per dire come questa sia praticamente agli esordi in questo mondo, o sbaglio?
Ma non è confermato che sia lei, la 3° positiva?
Sarebbe quasi un record, 3 scene (di cui una lesbo) e già si becca l'HIV....mi auguro di no....
Vabbeh che te la puoi beccare anche senza fare film porno, però
Il problema con Delgado (al contrario di Cameron) e' che non ha voluto uscire allo scoperto ("go public"). Ha chiuso i suoi conti su i social media ha fatto i bagagli ed e' sparita, e non vuole fare nessun commento sulla sua situazione. Dunque non si ha potuto conoscere altri dettagli su questa storia di questo test positivo, cosa ha girato, dove, quando, con chi, e se veramente tutte queste persone (con chi avuto contatto) sono state identificate, avvisate, ecc
Ora resta il mistero della 4a persona. Gli rodono le mani a FSC di sapere ma l'attore ha deciso di raccontare la sua storia altrove e i dettagli non si conoscono.
-
Drogato_ di_porno
- Storico dell'impulso
- Messaggi: 77512
- Iscritto il: 20/06/2002, 2:00
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
secondo me è un miracolo che dagli anni '70 ad oggi il numero di HIV sia stato limitato
"Non devo essere io ad insegnarvi che avete nemici ed in gran numero, che non sanno perché lo siano, ma che come cani bastardi di villaggio, si mettono ad abbaiare quando i loro simili lo fanno" (Shakespeare, Enrico VIII)
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
Gambo192 ha scritto:Se lo dicono sarà vero.
Xander Corvus risulta negativo, per cui non vedo come accusarlo.
Beh.. Però è assurdo che continui tranquillamente a girare anche nel cosiddetto periodo di incubazione dai..
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
Negli anni 70 non si conosceva HIV/AIDS. Si comincio a parlarlne verso la meta degli anni 80 (il caso celebre di Rock Hudson).Drogato_ di_porno ha scritto:secondo me è un miracolo che dagli anni '70 ad oggi il numero di HIV sia stato limitato
L'industria porno gay americana fu decimata a quel tempo. E poi si seppe del caso di John Holmes che aveva nascosto la sua malattia per molto tempo.
Per il resto, non sappiamo quanti attori/attrici hanno scoperto di essere infetti di HIV e se ne sono andati (o scacciati) senza fare tanto rumore.
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
In effetti, a soffermarsi sull'ultima frase di Len, c'è da rabbrividire
Per il mio ego può bastare che SCB mi citi nella sua firma, tutto il resto è noia.
Cicciuzzo 1.6.2016
Mi spiegate come postare le immagini, sono scemo oltre che cornuto
Furore 1.3.2017
Cicciuzzo 1.6.2016
Mi spiegate come postare le immagini, sono scemo oltre che cornuto
Furore 1.3.2017
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
Beh...... consultate la lista di attori/attrici porno deceduti (per causa di HIV/AIDS).scb ha scritto:In effetti, a soffermarsi sull'ultima frase di Len, c'è da rabbrividire
http://www.rame.net/faq/deadporn/
Per quelli/e che IAFD ha potuto scoprire......ma ci saranno sicuramente molti molti altri di cui non siamo al corrente.
E poi i loro famigliari certo non vanno a dire a tutti che un parente e' morto, o morto di AIDS. Al massimo diranno altre cose (crisi cardiaca, ecc). Figurati hanno della difficolta a rivelare che e' stato un suicidio, dunque non verranno a dire che e' stato a causa di complicazioni di AIDS.
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
Cameron Bay ha dato un'intervista a Huffington Post pubblicata oggi
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/1 ... os+Angeles
Lei racconta che:
= ha cominciato a fare l'escort un'anno fa
= qualche mese fa decise di girare scene porno e che ha girato una diecina fino ad ora (tutte senza condom). Le fu detto da un'attrice di non chiedere il condom, datosi che verrai rimpiazzata in un batter d'occhio.
= Tutte le scene che ha girato (a l'eccezionedi quella con Kink a San Francisco) furono a Los Angeles.
= All'infuori di quella per Kink, non ha mai girato scene anal. Le fu dett9o che poteva usare condom se desiderava, ma decise di no datosi che Xander aveva un post negative.
= durante quella scena per Kink, un maschio gli causo' delle ferite al seno per cui dovette farsi curare. Ha bisogno di farsi operare ma datosi che ha HIV, questo intervento non e' consigliabile.
= costa circa $2,000 per le medicine per controllare l'HIV, che lei non ha. Non puo girare piu scene porno e sta a considerare di fare dei cam shows
= conosce Rod Daily da circa 2 anni, ma non hanno mai girato scene hard
Cameron Bay, Porn Performer With HIV, Recalls Disturbing Experiences On Set, Where Condoms Weren't Used (EXCLUSIVE)
Posted: 09/12/2013 3:04 am EDT | Updated: 09/12/2013 3:04 am EDT
Owning nothing but a backpack full of clothes, Cameron Bay started working as an escort a year ago, hoping to rebuild her life. A few months ago, she performed in her first-ever porn scene -- an orgy with 10 people. After just nine more scenes, she discovered she has HIV. Nobody's sure where or when she contracted it.
During her scenes, none of the male performers she had sex with ever used a condom, she said. One female performer told her, "Don't even bring it up because they have somebody waiting to replace you."
"I learned that there's always someone younger and sexier, willing to do something you're not. It's a dog-eat-dog world," Bay said in an exclusive interview with The Huffington Post. "I think we need more choices because of that. Condoms should be a choice."
Last November, LA voters passed a measure mandating condom use in porn, despite a large, coordinated campaign against it by the porn industry. But since then, industry insiders say there has been no enforcement of the new law.
After having sex with five men in her first porn scene, Bay got a kidney infection and was sick for weeks (photo). She shot all but one of her scenes in LA for Hustler, Zero Tolerance and 21st Sextury. The only scene not shot in LA was her last scene, shot on July 31 for Kink.com in San Francisco, where the company is based. It's also the only time she shot BDSM (Bondage, Domination, Sadism and Masochism) and anal sex.
Bay was told that condoms were optional on that final shoot. She told people on set that she would leave the choice up to her male scene partner. Bay said to HuffPost she didn't think she needed to ask for a condom because her male co-star had a clean STD test. Kink.com confirmed to HuffPost that Bay was offered a condom but it was not used.
During the scene, a male extra hit Bay too hard on set and badly injured her left-breast tissue. Kink.com paid for her hospital visit through workers compensation, and her doctor ordered her not to work for two weeks so that her breast could recover, Bay said. The surgery she needs on her breast, which is artificially enlarged, has now been postponed -- possibly permanently -- because she has HIV.
Kink.com confirmed to HuffPost that performers' injuries on set are covered by workers compensation but the company's HR department was not available for comment on Bay's injury.
In the same shoot, there was a separate incident when "really, really bad stuff" happened on set, Bay said. "Let's just say there was an incident, and we should have stopped shooting," she said, declining to give more details. "Very poor decisions by a few of us."
"I was new to the industry. When I was told that I was safe to shoot, I was like, 'OK, cool,'" she said. "I had no idea. I really didn't understand."
When Bay found out she had HIV on Aug. 21, a moratorium was placed on porn shooting in LA. Unlike her breast injury, her HIV contraction is impossible to definitely tie to any one shoot so she has to pay for her expensive medication on her own. Without health insurance, she's not sure how she's going to afford it. Most porn performers do not have benefits.
The pills she needs to temper her HIV -- which already left her with severe flu-like symptoms for a week -- cost $2,000 for 30 days worth. "I spent more in one day on medical stuff than I did on rent for two months," she said. "I had a safety net of three months of not working and that cut into it a lot."
When she called a health insurance company inquiring about buying insurance, a case manager told her that she would not be able to get coverage for two years.
"She told me that if I survive two years, then I'm no longer as much of a risk and to call back then," Bay said.
And after being identified nationally as the HIV-positive patient zero that prompted a moratorium on porn, Bay doesn't expect to get gigs with other performers now. The porn industry is so small, she said, that she felt she had to go public with her HIV-positive test. Now, to make ends meet, she plans to begin solo performing via webcam from home.
Bay's last negative HIV test was on July 26, which cleared her to perform until Aug. 26. But she said she decided to get tested early on Aug. 19 because she heard a performer she had worked with had hepatitis C. That's when Bay was blindsided by the news that she had HIV.
"Thank God I went in when I did for hep C. I was scheduled to shoot," she said. "I could've been giving people HIV and had no idea."
That reality makes Bay believe that the system isn't working. Instead of being tested every 30 days, she said performers should be tested on set, before every shoot. Otherwise, she said, a performer could contract an STD after a clean test and still be good for 30 days.
Six days after Bay tested positive for HIV, the Free Speech Coalition, which oversees a database of all performers' STD tests, lifted the moratorium, saying that all performers who worked with Bay tested clean.
A week after the moratorium was lifted and porn shooting had resumed, Bay's boyfriend -- Rod Daily, a performer in gay porn -- announced that he also tested positive for HIV. Bay and Daily never performed on set together, but they have publicly been in a romantic relationship for two years. Neither of them can be sure how they contracted the virus.
Two days after Daily said he was HIV-positive, a third performer tested positive on Friday, prompting the FSC to re-impose the moratorium. The fact that two performers tested positive after the moratorium was lifted led some -- including Bay -- to say that the moratorium should have been in place longer.
Bay said she hopes that more performers in the industry will become educated about the risks so they can make informed decisions. "Education is power. I've done more reading in the past couple weeks than I have since high school," she said.
She said that if she had done her research prior to going on set, she would have asked producers for a condom each time and walked off the set if she was refused.
"Because at the end of the day, it's about your safety. And a piece of paper that says you're clear to shoot doesn't mean anything."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/1 ... os+Angeles
Lei racconta che:
= ha cominciato a fare l'escort un'anno fa
= qualche mese fa decise di girare scene porno e che ha girato una diecina fino ad ora (tutte senza condom). Le fu detto da un'attrice di non chiedere il condom, datosi che verrai rimpiazzata in un batter d'occhio.
= Tutte le scene che ha girato (a l'eccezionedi quella con Kink a San Francisco) furono a Los Angeles.
= All'infuori di quella per Kink, non ha mai girato scene anal. Le fu dett9o che poteva usare condom se desiderava, ma decise di no datosi che Xander aveva un post negative.
= durante quella scena per Kink, un maschio gli causo' delle ferite al seno per cui dovette farsi curare. Ha bisogno di farsi operare ma datosi che ha HIV, questo intervento non e' consigliabile.
= costa circa $2,000 per le medicine per controllare l'HIV, che lei non ha. Non puo girare piu scene porno e sta a considerare di fare dei cam shows
= conosce Rod Daily da circa 2 anni, ma non hanno mai girato scene hard
Cameron Bay, Porn Performer With HIV, Recalls Disturbing Experiences On Set, Where Condoms Weren't Used (EXCLUSIVE)
Posted: 09/12/2013 3:04 am EDT | Updated: 09/12/2013 3:04 am EDT
Owning nothing but a backpack full of clothes, Cameron Bay started working as an escort a year ago, hoping to rebuild her life. A few months ago, she performed in her first-ever porn scene -- an orgy with 10 people. After just nine more scenes, she discovered she has HIV. Nobody's sure where or when she contracted it.
During her scenes, none of the male performers she had sex with ever used a condom, she said. One female performer told her, "Don't even bring it up because they have somebody waiting to replace you."
"I learned that there's always someone younger and sexier, willing to do something you're not. It's a dog-eat-dog world," Bay said in an exclusive interview with The Huffington Post. "I think we need more choices because of that. Condoms should be a choice."
Last November, LA voters passed a measure mandating condom use in porn, despite a large, coordinated campaign against it by the porn industry. But since then, industry insiders say there has been no enforcement of the new law.
After having sex with five men in her first porn scene, Bay got a kidney infection and was sick for weeks (photo). She shot all but one of her scenes in LA for Hustler, Zero Tolerance and 21st Sextury. The only scene not shot in LA was her last scene, shot on July 31 for Kink.com in San Francisco, where the company is based. It's also the only time she shot BDSM (Bondage, Domination, Sadism and Masochism) and anal sex.
Bay was told that condoms were optional on that final shoot. She told people on set that she would leave the choice up to her male scene partner. Bay said to HuffPost she didn't think she needed to ask for a condom because her male co-star had a clean STD test. Kink.com confirmed to HuffPost that Bay was offered a condom but it was not used.
During the scene, a male extra hit Bay too hard on set and badly injured her left-breast tissue. Kink.com paid for her hospital visit through workers compensation, and her doctor ordered her not to work for two weeks so that her breast could recover, Bay said. The surgery she needs on her breast, which is artificially enlarged, has now been postponed -- possibly permanently -- because she has HIV.
Kink.com confirmed to HuffPost that performers' injuries on set are covered by workers compensation but the company's HR department was not available for comment on Bay's injury.
In the same shoot, there was a separate incident when "really, really bad stuff" happened on set, Bay said. "Let's just say there was an incident, and we should have stopped shooting," she said, declining to give more details. "Very poor decisions by a few of us."
"I was new to the industry. When I was told that I was safe to shoot, I was like, 'OK, cool,'" she said. "I had no idea. I really didn't understand."
When Bay found out she had HIV on Aug. 21, a moratorium was placed on porn shooting in LA. Unlike her breast injury, her HIV contraction is impossible to definitely tie to any one shoot so she has to pay for her expensive medication on her own. Without health insurance, she's not sure how she's going to afford it. Most porn performers do not have benefits.
The pills she needs to temper her HIV -- which already left her with severe flu-like symptoms for a week -- cost $2,000 for 30 days worth. "I spent more in one day on medical stuff than I did on rent for two months," she said. "I had a safety net of three months of not working and that cut into it a lot."
When she called a health insurance company inquiring about buying insurance, a case manager told her that she would not be able to get coverage for two years.
"She told me that if I survive two years, then I'm no longer as much of a risk and to call back then," Bay said.
And after being identified nationally as the HIV-positive patient zero that prompted a moratorium on porn, Bay doesn't expect to get gigs with other performers now. The porn industry is so small, she said, that she felt she had to go public with her HIV-positive test. Now, to make ends meet, she plans to begin solo performing via webcam from home.
Bay's last negative HIV test was on July 26, which cleared her to perform until Aug. 26. But she said she decided to get tested early on Aug. 19 because she heard a performer she had worked with had hepatitis C. That's when Bay was blindsided by the news that she had HIV.
"Thank God I went in when I did for hep C. I was scheduled to shoot," she said. "I could've been giving people HIV and had no idea."
That reality makes Bay believe that the system isn't working. Instead of being tested every 30 days, she said performers should be tested on set, before every shoot. Otherwise, she said, a performer could contract an STD after a clean test and still be good for 30 days.
Six days after Bay tested positive for HIV, the Free Speech Coalition, which oversees a database of all performers' STD tests, lifted the moratorium, saying that all performers who worked with Bay tested clean.
A week after the moratorium was lifted and porn shooting had resumed, Bay's boyfriend -- Rod Daily, a performer in gay porn -- announced that he also tested positive for HIV. Bay and Daily never performed on set together, but they have publicly been in a romantic relationship for two years. Neither of them can be sure how they contracted the virus.
Two days after Daily said he was HIV-positive, a third performer tested positive on Friday, prompting the FSC to re-impose the moratorium. The fact that two performers tested positive after the moratorium was lifted led some -- including Bay -- to say that the moratorium should have been in place longer.
Bay said she hopes that more performers in the industry will become educated about the risks so they can make informed decisions. "Education is power. I've done more reading in the past couple weeks than I have since high school," she said.
She said that if she had done her research prior to going on set, she would have asked producers for a condom each time and walked off the set if she was refused.
"Because at the end of the day, it's about your safety. And a piece of paper that says you're clear to shoot doesn't mean anything."
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
Len801 ha scritto:Lei chi? La 3a attrice con HIV? O che quella nella foto e' Sofia Delgado?texdionis ha scritto:confermo è lei
quella nella foto è Sofia Delgado, ancora accreditata nel roster dell'agenzia ATMLA, (ora però segnalata come "not available", stessa cosa per Cameron Bay)
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
Anche perché di nuove alla ATMLA non ce ne sono tante
YANKEE-Crew Official President: per la supremazia dell'erotismo occidentale - contro il pornopiattume delle melanzane, soviet e mangia-sushi!
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
Stavo scherzando (ma non te ne sei accorto). Non avrei postato quelle foto, se non ero abbastanza sicuro del contenuto del mio post. E visto che non ho retrattato niente nei post susseguenti.....texdionis ha scritto:Len801 ha scritto:Lei chi? La 3a attrice con HIV? O che quella nella foto e' Sofia Delgado?texdionis ha scritto:confermo è lei
quella nella foto è Sofia Delgado, ancora accreditata nel roster dell'agenzia ATMLA, (ora però segnalata come "not available", stessa cosa per Cameron Bay)
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
Visto il successo di Measure B alla fine di 2012, per l'uso obbligatorio del condom nella regione di Los Angeles, oggi si vota per AB 640 "requiring condom use in all adult films produced in California", cio per l'uso obbligatorio del condom in TUTTO lo stato di California.
http://fair4ca.org/
C'e alta probabilita che (con tutte questo ultime storie di test HEP e 3-4 test positivi di HIV nell'industria porno) questa legge sara ammessa e votata dalla maggioranza della legilsatura di California. Datosi che e' stata una richiesta d'urgenza vuol dire che ci vuole una maggioranza di 2 terzi di voti della legislatura
http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces ... 20140AB640
California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 establishes certain safety and other responsibilities of employers and employees. Violations of the act under certain circumstances are a crime.
This bill would require an employer engaged in the production of an adult film to adopt prescribed practices and procedures to protect employees from exposure to, and infection by, sexually transmitted diseases, including engineering and work practice controls, an exposure control plan, hepatitis B vaccinations, medical monitoring, and information and training on health and safety. The bill would define terms for those purposes. Because a violation of the act would be a crime under certain circumstances, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime.
This bill would provide that its provisions are severable.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY2/3 Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 6720 is added to the Labor Code, to read:
6720.
(a) The Legislature finds and declares that the protection of workers in the adult film industry is the responsibility of multiple layers of government, with the department being responsible for worker safety and the county being responsible for protecting the public health. Therefore, this section shall not be construed to prohibit a city, county, or city and county from implementing a local ordinance regulating the adult film industry, provided that nothing in the local ordinance contradicts any provision of this section.
(b) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) “Adult film” means any commercial film, video, multimedia, or other recorded representation during the production of which performers actually engage in sexual intercourse, including oral, vaginal, or anal penetration.
(2) “Employee” means a person who is an employee or independent contractor, regardless of whether the person is shown in the adult film, who, during the production of the adult film, performs sexual intercourse, including oral, vaginal, or anal penetration.
(3) “Employer” means a company, partnership, corporation, or individual engaged in the production of an adult film. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that the name on the material for commercial distribution is the employer unless there is evidence to the contrary as demonstrated through contractual or employment records.
(4) “Sexually transmitted disease” or “STD” means any infection commonly spread by sexual conduct, including, but not limited to, HIV/AIDS, gonorrhea, syphilis, chlamydia, hepatitis, genital human papillomavirus infection, and genital herpes.
(c) An employer shall maintain engineering and work practice controls sufficient to protect employees from exposure to blood and any potentially infectious materials, in accordance with Section 5193 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. Engineering and work practice controls shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Simulation of sex acts using acting, production, and postproduction techniques.
(2) Provision of and required use of condoms and other protective barriers whenever acts of vaginal or anal intercourse are filmed.
(3) The provision of condom-safe water-based or silicone-based lubricants to facilitate the use of condoms.
(4) Plastic and other disposable materials to clean up sets.
(5) Sharps containers for disposal of contaminated sharps, including, but not limited to, any blades, wires, or broken glass.
(d) An employer shall maintain an exposure control plan in accordance with Section 5193 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. An employer shall not be required to comply with any provision related to establishing and maintaining a sharps injury log, or any provision regarding regulated waste.
(e) An employer shall make available the hepatitis B vaccination and all medical followup required by Section 5193 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, for any employee engaged in the production of adult films, at the employer’s expense.
(f) An employer shall designate a custodian of records for purposes of this section. A copy of the original production shall be retained by the custodian of records.
(g) An employer shall pay the costs of required medical monitoring, such as STD testing, and keep confidential employee records.
(h) (1) An employer shall adopt, implement, maintain, and update, as required, a written health and safety program that meets the requirements of the Injury and Illness Prevention Program and the bloodborne pathogens standard, described, respectively, in Sections 3203 and 5193 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations.
(2) An employer shall provide a training program in accordance with Section 5193 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. The training requirements of this subdivision may be satisfied by proof that the employee has received appropriate training at another workplace or from an appropriate third party approved by the department in the prior 12 months.
(i) This section shall not be construed to require condoms, barriers, or other personal protective equipment to be visible in the final product of an adult film.
(j) The Legislature finds and declares that screening for STDs is a critical public health measure and should be employed wherever possible, including the adult film industry. Therefore, this section shall not be construed to impede or replace STD screening of all employees, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), pursuant to STD screening protocols established by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the State Department of Public Health, and the public health department in the county where the filming occurs.
SEC. 2.
The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 3
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.
SEC. 4.
This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
In order to protect workers in the adult film industry from an imminent threat to public health as soon as possible, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.
http://fair4ca.org/
C'e alta probabilita che (con tutte questo ultime storie di test HEP e 3-4 test positivi di HIV nell'industria porno) questa legge sara ammessa e votata dalla maggioranza della legilsatura di California. Datosi che e' stata una richiesta d'urgenza vuol dire che ci vuole una maggioranza di 2 terzi di voti della legislatura
http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces ... 20140AB640
California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973 establishes certain safety and other responsibilities of employers and employees. Violations of the act under certain circumstances are a crime.
This bill would require an employer engaged in the production of an adult film to adopt prescribed practices and procedures to protect employees from exposure to, and infection by, sexually transmitted diseases, including engineering and work practice controls, an exposure control plan, hepatitis B vaccinations, medical monitoring, and information and training on health and safety. The bill would define terms for those purposes. Because a violation of the act would be a crime under certain circumstances, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime.
This bill would provide that its provisions are severable.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY2/3 Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 6720 is added to the Labor Code, to read:
6720.
(a) The Legislature finds and declares that the protection of workers in the adult film industry is the responsibility of multiple layers of government, with the department being responsible for worker safety and the county being responsible for protecting the public health. Therefore, this section shall not be construed to prohibit a city, county, or city and county from implementing a local ordinance regulating the adult film industry, provided that nothing in the local ordinance contradicts any provision of this section.
(b) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) “Adult film” means any commercial film, video, multimedia, or other recorded representation during the production of which performers actually engage in sexual intercourse, including oral, vaginal, or anal penetration.
(2) “Employee” means a person who is an employee or independent contractor, regardless of whether the person is shown in the adult film, who, during the production of the adult film, performs sexual intercourse, including oral, vaginal, or anal penetration.
(3) “Employer” means a company, partnership, corporation, or individual engaged in the production of an adult film. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that the name on the material for commercial distribution is the employer unless there is evidence to the contrary as demonstrated through contractual or employment records.
(4) “Sexually transmitted disease” or “STD” means any infection commonly spread by sexual conduct, including, but not limited to, HIV/AIDS, gonorrhea, syphilis, chlamydia, hepatitis, genital human papillomavirus infection, and genital herpes.
(c) An employer shall maintain engineering and work practice controls sufficient to protect employees from exposure to blood and any potentially infectious materials, in accordance with Section 5193 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. Engineering and work practice controls shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Simulation of sex acts using acting, production, and postproduction techniques.
(2) Provision of and required use of condoms and other protective barriers whenever acts of vaginal or anal intercourse are filmed.
(3) The provision of condom-safe water-based or silicone-based lubricants to facilitate the use of condoms.
(4) Plastic and other disposable materials to clean up sets.
(5) Sharps containers for disposal of contaminated sharps, including, but not limited to, any blades, wires, or broken glass.
(d) An employer shall maintain an exposure control plan in accordance with Section 5193 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. An employer shall not be required to comply with any provision related to establishing and maintaining a sharps injury log, or any provision regarding regulated waste.
(e) An employer shall make available the hepatitis B vaccination and all medical followup required by Section 5193 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, for any employee engaged in the production of adult films, at the employer’s expense.
(f) An employer shall designate a custodian of records for purposes of this section. A copy of the original production shall be retained by the custodian of records.
(g) An employer shall pay the costs of required medical monitoring, such as STD testing, and keep confidential employee records.
(h) (1) An employer shall adopt, implement, maintain, and update, as required, a written health and safety program that meets the requirements of the Injury and Illness Prevention Program and the bloodborne pathogens standard, described, respectively, in Sections 3203 and 5193 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations.
(2) An employer shall provide a training program in accordance with Section 5193 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. The training requirements of this subdivision may be satisfied by proof that the employee has received appropriate training at another workplace or from an appropriate third party approved by the department in the prior 12 months.
(i) This section shall not be construed to require condoms, barriers, or other personal protective equipment to be visible in the final product of an adult film.
(j) The Legislature finds and declares that screening for STDs is a critical public health measure and should be employed wherever possible, including the adult film industry. Therefore, this section shall not be construed to impede or replace STD screening of all employees, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), pursuant to STD screening protocols established by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the State Department of Public Health, and the public health department in the county where the filming occurs.
SEC. 2.
The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 3
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.
SEC. 4.
This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
In order to protect workers in the adult film industry from an imminent threat to public health as soon as possible, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
Il Progetto di legge AB 640, non se n'e parlato ieri alla legislatura di California. Giornata troppo piena di altrl progetti di leggi da discutere. Se ne riparlera a dicembre 2013 o inizio del 2014.
http://www.xbiz.com/news/168850
http://www.xbiz.com/news/168850
Ultima modifica di Len801 il 13/09/2013, 15:33, modificato 1 volta in totale.
-
lider maximo
- Storico dell'impulso
- Messaggi: 16901
- Iscritto il: 22/06/2013, 0:01
- Località: In giro da qualche parte con tre bottiglie 3 di birra in mano.
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
La Free Spech starà facendo salti di gioia!!!Len801 ha scritto:Il Progetto di legge AB 640, non se n'e parlato ieri alla legislatura di California. Giornata troppo piena di altrl progetti di leggi da discutere. Se ne riparlera a dicembre 2013 o inizio del 2014.
Mi confermi 2 cose, LEN?
La Measure B è valevole solo in California?
La positività di questa Sofia Delgado è stata confermata?
#ALLEGRIOUT(dal calcio) non è importante, è l'unica cosa che conta.
Re: Usa, referendum per profilattico in film porno
=la FSC e' un'organizazione che dovrebbe essere li per l'industria e interpreti. E' amministrata da personaggi dell'industria che non se ne fregano degli attori/attrici. Danno communicati di stampa quasi tutti I giorni che non fanno senso e contradittori. Dicono che tutti questi casi di HIV (3 ultimi) NON hanno niente a che fare con scene porno, cioe che queste persone non sono state infette in un set porno. Ma come fanno a dirlo/provarlo? Poi negano che c'e un 4o maschio con HIV, e questa settimana dicono che probabilmente si tratta di un attore che si e' ritirato 4 anni fa. Cioe': lo sanno che esiste o che non esiste, e sanno chi e? Poi chiedici che stanno facendo per aiutare Cameron Bay/Rod Daily e Delgado!!!!??? Ah giusto..... non sono stato infetti su un set porno, dunque non c'e nessun bisogno di "aiutarli", eh?lider maximo ha scritto:La Free Spech starà facendo salti di gioia!!!Len801 ha scritto:Il Progetto di legge AB 640, non se n'e parlato ieri alla legislatura di California. Giornata troppo piena di altrl progetti di leggi da discutere. Se ne riparlera a dicembre 2013 o inizio del 2014.
Mi confermi 2 cose, LEN?
La Measure B è valevole solo in California?
La positività di questa Sofia Delgado è stata confermata?
Ecco cosa dice FSC: ""We're not against condoms. We're against condoms being mandatory. Our performers prefer not to use condoms." Non sono contro l'uso di condon, sono solo contro l'uso OBBLIGATORIO di condom. Se rircordi l'intevista di Cameron disse che quando inizio la sua carriera le fu detto di una attrice di non insistere per condom, e che sarebbe rimpiazzata da un'altra in un batter d'occhio. Dunque se scegli di girare con condom, non farai tanta carriera e non lavorerai.
=Measure B e' stata approvata l'anno scorso (novembre 2012 se ricordo bene) ma e' solo valida per la regione di Los Angeles. Il progetto AB640 (se veniva approvata ieri) doveva essere valida per TUTTO lo stato di California. Dunque per il momento l'industria porno puo' girare film porno senza condom fuori della regione di Los Angeles.
=Delgado ha ottenuto un test postivo di HIV. Dovevano fare altri test per determinare se il suo virus e' della stessa traccia("strain") di quello di Cameron e Daily, ma lei e' "sparita" e ora non si sa piu niente.